<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Who made this gun</title>
        <link>http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/topic/8924/t/Who-made-this-gun.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ 


I understand that this gun was made by the Austrian goverment as a trial gun for the United States about 1870. The caliber is 45-70, has an Enfield rear sight
and a standard front sight. The stock is a cut down 1864 US 58 musket stock. The stock was cut at the first band and cut the reverse of a pencil. The forarm
was then cut to match the cut in the stock, I know because when I purchased rifle it was in two pieces. The pictures show were stock was glued by me. The lock
plate is stamped US... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 05:56:26 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:13:05 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who made this gun ]]></title>
			<link>http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/reply/61372/t/Who-made-this-gun.html#reply-61372</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  The length from outside of rim to the riflings is 2.45 inches. It looks like there may be rings around the chamber at about 2.0 inches. The bore mikes at
  .465 for the groves and .457 for the lands. The base is approx. .508 and the neck about .483(outside). The only cartridge that I can find near this is the
  11.7 X 51.6R Remingtom Danish. This cartridge was used by the Danish about 1875. Would they have used such a rifle as this?
</blockquote>The 11.7mm Danish round had a... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (PommyB)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/sreply/61372</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:13:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who made this gun ]]></title>
			<link>http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/reply/61021/t/Who-made-this-gun.html#reply-61021</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ So...based on your dimensions, a Martini bullet in .465&quot; to .467&quot;, and possibly a 45-90 case looks like it might work.  What is the rate of twist in
this barrel?
<br>
<br>
David Kaiser
<br>
Montezuma, IA
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (David K)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/sreply/61021</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:04:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who made this gun ]]></title>
			<link>http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/reply/61013/t/Who-made-this-gun.html#reply-61013</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ My 1870 Peabody Spanish Model also has 3 (relatively) equal spaced lands &amp; grooves if that is helpful for
<br>
potential barrel maker. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (gcrank1)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/sreply/61013</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 09:09:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who made this gun ]]></title>
			<link>http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/reply/61005/t/Who-made-this-gun.html#reply-61005</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I have a Braendlin Martini with almost identical chamber dimensions, which I believe to be 450 Rigby Match. Works OK with 45-90, black!!!
<br>
Doug ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (gungadoug)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/sreply/61005</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 07:16:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who made this gun ]]></title>
			<link>http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/reply/59208/t/Who-made-this-gun.html#reply-59208</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <img src="http://images.yuku.com/image/pjpeg/ad4365df261b0edd858c77bb007c455590bcaa20.pjpg" alt="image">

<p><br></p><img src="http://images.yuku.com/image/pjpeg/ca926c72750818b57ea02b417ee347cefc469e24.pjpg" alt="image">

<p>Here are the castings for the rifle. The length from outside of rim to the riflings is 2.45 inches. It looks like there may be rings around the chamber at
about 2.0 inches. The bore mikes at .465 for the groves and .457 for the lands. The base is approx. .508 and the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (rotchie)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/sreply/59208</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:35:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who made this gun ]]></title>
			<link>http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/reply/59175/t/Who-made-this-gun.html#reply-59175</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ At 2.45-inch length, it is pretty close to the .45-90 Sharps which was nominally 2.4-in. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (trfuller)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/sreply/59175</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:29:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who made this gun ]]></title>
			<link>http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/reply/59169/t/Who-made-this-gun.html#reply-59169</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ A photo of your chamber cast would be helpful, along with any pertinent dimensions from it.
<br>
<br>
David
<br>
Montezuma, IA ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (David K)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/sreply/59169</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:14:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who made this gun ]]></title>
			<link>http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/reply/59088/t/Who-made-this-gun.html#reply-59088</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Gentleman,
<br>
 You have made me back up and rethink the 45-70 theory. I shot the rifle today as a 45-70 and it did not shoot well. <em>It would hold 6-8 inch groups, but I
like smaller groups. Came home, read your responces and got to thinking. Could this be something other than a 45-70.
<br>
I did a chamber cast to see and am surprises with the results. The bore is 3 rifles and 3 groves. The groves are approx. .22 inches wide and the lands about .2
in. wide. The lands measure about .457... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (rotchie)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/sreply/59088</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:19:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who made this gun ]]></title>
			<link>http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/reply/59084/t/Who-made-this-gun.html#reply-59084</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The receiver could be Berdan rather than Allin. A view along the top of the closed action and barrel would be informative. I just noticed the barrel where it
joins the action... that fluting reminds me of an 1881 Marlin... or a Sharps, which would explain the 45/70 part. If the action is an 1866, there shouldn&#39;t
be a joint, as the trough was cut directly into the barrel. Original 50/70 barrel chopped, with reduced caliber replacement barrel screwed in? I still say
it&#39;s a Belgian... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Viclav)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/sreply/59084</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:34:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who made this gun ]]></title>
			<link>http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/reply/59081/t/Who-made-this-gun.html#reply-59081</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The barrel is stamped 10.6 (mm) but I don&#39;t know exactly what that calibre would be.  My cape gun is marked 10.6 as well and I feed it .44-40WCF.
<br>
<br>
-Ryan ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Carignan Salieres)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/sreply/59081</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:53:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who made this gun ]]></title>
			<link>http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/reply/59080/t/Who-made-this-gun.html#reply-59080</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Just out of interest, you say it is in 45-70--is that actually stamped on the barrel or breech somewhere, or might it be the very similar 11.7x51R Danish? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (trfuller)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/sreply/59080</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who made this gun ]]></title>
			<link>http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/reply/59074/t/Who-made-this-gun.html#reply-59074</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Ryan,
<br>
 I knew that one mark was Belgian but not the others.
<br>
Victor,
<br>
  I am inclined to thank what you suggest may be correct. It does seem logiacl. I really do not know.
<br>
<br>
Gentleman, Thank you both for your input.
<br>
<br>
If anyone knows more about this rifle please let me know.
<br>
<br>
rotchie ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (rotchie)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/sreply/59074</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:28:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who made this gun ]]></title>
			<link>http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/reply/59068/t/Who-made-this-gun.html#reply-59068</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Is it possible the gun started out as one of the M1866 rifles sent to France for the war of 1870? The Liege trade got hold of many American rifles,
muzzle-loaders and cartidge guns, after the conflict. Many Remington rolling blocks were refitted with Liege-made barrels and exported. Not likely that such a
weapon using an already established (and supplanted by the M1868) U.S. breech system and U.S. parts would have been submitted as a trial gun to the U.S. in
1870... in a caliber not yet... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Viclav)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/sreply/59068</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 06:41:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who made this gun ]]></title>
			<link>http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/reply/59066/t/Who-made-this-gun.html#reply-59066</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The markings are all Belgian.
<br>
<br>
-Ryan ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Carignan Salieres)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/sreply/59066</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 06:06:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Who made this gun ]]></title>
			<link>http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/topic/8924/t/Who-made-this-gun.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <img src="http://images.yuku.com/image/pjpeg/e0f16d250a8f7b074b840c1123474636a029d442.pjpg" alt="image"><img src="http://images.yuku.com/image/pjpeg/7fc165280485720f423c0ee9bb03cf340b315c9e.pjpg" alt="image"><img src="http://images.yuku.com/image/pjpeg/34736a0229040d1f8259730004aa47a4a6d43d81.pjpg" alt="image"><img src="http://images.yuku.com/image/pjpeg/31c26332a807b8897100f04a90cbf6e93f1e4caf.pjpg" alt="image"><img... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (rotchie)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://britishmilitariaforums.yuku.com/topic/8924</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 05:56:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>